大觀園空間特質理想與現實兼具，持理想世界論者多以烏托邦與樂園稱之，
本文透過耙梳二詞的定義，指出大觀園與烏托邦、樂園之間的差異，並進一步援
引傅柯「異托邦」的空間概念，試圖重新詮釋大觀園理想與現實兼具的空間特
質。由於異托邦除了相對於既有的現實空間之外，本身亦容許相互衝突、矛盾的
異質共存，因此將大觀園視為異托邦，方能在大觀園中同時納入理想與現實、純
淨與污穢，也才更能理解大觀園如何在兩種力量的拉扯下逐步走向滅亡。唯有正
視光明與黑暗的兩者並存，才能確切理解大觀園內部的糾結，也才能更進一步瞭
解大觀園在《紅樓夢》整體設計的空間意義。

The spatial characteristics of the Grand View Garden embody both idealism and
reality. Many proponents of idealism often refer to it as a utopia or paradise. This
article examines the diff erences between the Grand View Garden and utopia/paradise
by defi ning these terms. It further introduces Foucault’s concept of “heterotopia” to
reinterpret the spatial characteristics of the Grand View Garden. Heterotopia allows
for the coexistence of conflicting and contradictory elements alongside existing
reality. Therefore, considering the Grand View Garden as a heterotopia allows for the
inclusion of both idealism and reality, purity and impurity within it, enabling a better
understanding of its gradual demise under the pull of these opposing forces. Only by
acknowledging the coexistence of light and darkness can one truly comprehend the
intricacies within the Grand View Garden and grasp its spatial signifi cance within the
overall design of Dream of the Red Chamber.